First, DV is a standard-definition format, do not need such a powerful editing suite, and tap its potential. You do not need to 8MB of RAM, Final Cut Pro X and Apple's latest processor rendering and color change and DV editing timeline.
SD (Standard Definition) is a format that is widely acknowledged that in the network, and most YouTube video running in the low-resolution mode. Not everyone can transmit HD 720p or 1080p for this problem, so SD is still very relevant. Even those we offer a 15MB connection, we do not necessarily need to support 720p video enjoyment. So, if you've got a old school classic Panasonic DVX100, Sony PD150, it is still cool! Bonus on all DV cameras are much cheaper than their professional counterparts. There is a bargain, especially if you're learning how to make a movie, and hope that the 3 CCD camera (semi-professional standard).
Well, the shortcomings of DV is that it does not have as much color depth, resolution, or the quality of the HD workflow, but if you're doing a documentary, behind-the-scenes video or TV / Network report, it is a solids solution. Even if it is a low-budget short film production, it still has its place. The DV In my opinion, the biggest drawback is, you have to tape the facts. Within minutes, you can download all the clips. However, the positive side is that it can help your comments footage and learn more about your shooting and shooting structure. Spielberg still prefer Steenbeck? It has a good reason. With HD, we are actually getting lazy, because it is easier to shoot more material, and then dumped in the timeline. DV, you will be a little conservative, because you know you will see all those damn tape sequence capture.
DV is still a valuable format, in my opinion, although it does not provide us with HD charm, it does provide a good solution for a lot of us do not need a Hollywood action movie to start shooting.
No comments:
Post a Comment